Previous Chapter: Safe System Implementation Framework
Suggested Citation: "Safe System Practice Extraction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.

Safe System Practice Extraction

Considering the reviewed Safe System principles and implementation frameworks, this section describes how our team carried out a sweeping review of the academic and trade (gray) literature on the Safe System approach as well as other guiding frameworks from peer countries that have significantly improved road user safety over the past three decades:

  • Safe System approach
  • Road to Zero
  • Vision Zero
  • Target Zero
  • Toward Zero Deaths
  • Sustainable Safety
  • Traffic safety culture
  • One Network, Movement, and Place framework
  • Safety-related asset management strategies

Search Strategy

In addition to researching guiding safety frameworks, the team developed the following list of keyword search terms organized around diverse safety countermeasures, vehicle technologies, safety analysis methods, safety procedures, and specific road user groups. We then systematically searched for traffic safety-relevant literature in Transport Research International Documentation (TRID), PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar:

rural road safety

systemic safety

self-explaining road*

safe road users

safe roads

emergency response

safety polic*

drivers AND older OR young

safety campaign*

traffic impact analysis

level of service OR quality of service

traffic volume*

travel demand management

older road users

advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS)

design speed*

maintenance

traffic safety culture OR safety culture

asset manag*

youth OR young people OR child*

safe vehicles

post-crash care

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

tribal communit*

emergency management*

risk management

long-range plan*

capacity

conflict*

time to collision

forward collision warning OR forward collision avoid*

location efficienc*

operating speed*

operations

risk assessment*

health impact assessment*

injury surveillance

safe speeds

project priorit*

cycl* OR bicycl*

transit riders OR transit users

low vision or blind*

automatic emergency braking

impact speed*

congestion pric*

target speed*

post-encroachment time

blind spot warning

backcasting

multi-criteria analysis

Suggested Citation: "Safe System Practice Extraction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.

Next, the team saved 549 papers in SciWheel, a citation management software available through University of North Carolina (UNC) libraries. From these 549 papers, the team identified 465 that likely described safety practices and management systems.

Following identification of potentially relevant papers, team members (1) summarized study purposes, methods, and findings and (2) extracted safety practices—concrete, visualizable safety-oriented acts that can be routinely carried out or applied over a broad geographic area. To ensure reliability across members carrying out the extractions, the project manager led the team through a virtual tutorial on how to summarize and extract key information from papers, practicing a few applied examples together. Team members also summarized those papers that did not feature a visualizable safety practice to capture more holistic approaches or theoretical work. In addition to summarizing each paper, the team provided a brief description of how the practice is related to safety and protecting road users (e.g., “reducing vehicle speeds will improve reaction time for drivers in the event of a potential conflict and reduce the risk of death or serious injury should a crash occur”). Alternatively, members were tasked with indicating whether a practice would conceivably deepen our understanding of injury contributors (e.g., systemic or risk-based safety assessments).

These procedures yielded a total of 75 safety practices, procedures, and countermeasures, all of which are displayed in Tables 12 through 17. The team organized these safety practices into six interrelated domains:

  1. Policy
  2. Planning
  3. Design
  4. Operations and Maintenance
  5. Law Enforcement
  6. Post-Crash Response

To acquire a better understanding of professionals’ perceptions of these 75 safety practices, the team designed a practitioner survey, the development process and results of which are described next.

Suggested Citation: "Safe System Practice Extraction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 8
Suggested Citation: "Safe System Practice Extraction." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 9
Next Chapter: Practitioner Survey
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.