Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations (2025)

Chapter: All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)

Previous Chapter: Survey Results
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.

All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)

Table 12. Policy practice feasibility and impact scores (n = 85).

Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Installing leading pedestrian intervals with right-turn-on-red restrictions in areas with high pedestrian activity. 1.078 0.385 High Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Updating NHTSA’s NCAP to include pedestrian detection and collision avoidance safety tests. 0.604 0.403 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Requiring alcohol ignition interlocks installed for all drivers convicted of DUI. 0.501 0.293 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Developing policies requiring forward- and near-side-facing sensors on heavy vehicles to detect pedestrians and cyclists. 0.337 0.324 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Setting posted speed limits based on harm minimization principles, road function, and severe crash types rather than an 85th percentile rule. 0.290 0.097 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Instituting or enforcing a statewide primary enforcement seat belt use law. 0.169 0.179 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Implementing speed safety cameras (automated speed enforcement) that use revenues to improve safety. –0.259 0.459 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Instituting or enforcing a statewide universal motorcycle helmet law, which would require all motorcyclists to wear US DOT compliant helmets, regardless of the rider’s age or experience. –0.100 0.197 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing seat belt interlocks in vehicles. –0.055 0.150 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Implementing red-light camera enforcement that uses revenues to fund safety infrastructure. –0.046 0.133 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing speed governors in all municipal fleet vehicles. 0.592 –0.712 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Extending GDL requirements to include all novice drivers regardless of age. 0.136 –0.258 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Establishing a default speed limit of 20 mph or lower in every business or residential district. –0.062 –0.271 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Instituting immediate administrative license revocation or suspension (ALR/ALS) for alcohol- and drug-impaired driving offenses. –0.312 –0.085 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Lowering the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving from 0.08 to 0.05. –0.146 –0.463 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Requiring location-based speed limiters in all commercial and private vehicles in areas with high pedestrian activity. –0.796 0.080 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Instituting a driver license renewal program that requires passing an on-road driving test every 5–10 years. –0.477 –0.295 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Promoting the installation of technology in private automobiles that records drivers’ distraction, drowsiness, and other forms of impairment. –0.788 –0.133 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Establishing maximums in vehicle size (in terms of width, length, height, weight) permitted in areas with high pedestrian activity. –0.666 –0.486 Low Feasibility/Low Impact

Table 13. Planning practice feasibility and impact scores (n = 60).

Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Incorporating road safety audits in project scoping/planning phases. 0.724 0.302 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Prioritizing injury risk-based (systemic) safety assessments over crash “hot spot” or “black spot” approaches. 0.225 0.417 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Communicating with communities not previously involved with decision-making to learn about their safety issues and concerns on a routine basis (annually, quarterly). 0.402 0.225 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Coordinating with land use planners to align land use and roadway purposes (e.g., deciding whether the road’s purpose is access- or mobility-centered). 0.052 0.257 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Simulating the safety effects of land developments and investments in long-range plans. –0.233 –0.019 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Incorporating nontraditional transportation safety data sources [e.g., EMS, hospital, social determinants of health, environmental, and historical (e.g., redlining)] as part of problem identification and project prioritization processes. –0.307 –0.012 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing or expanding car-free zones in areas with high pedestrian activity. –0.702 0.370 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Setting a goal to reduce road deaths by 50% by 2030 in safety plans. 0.071 –0.532 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Replacing travel forecasting (“predict and provide”) with backcasting (“decide and provide,” i.e., starting from a vision of desirable travel patterns and working backward to realize the vision). –0.294 –0.257 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Encouraging and facilitating public use of self-reporting (via mobile app or survey) to capture collisions and other events falling outside the scope of traditional crash reporting (e.g., near misses, pedestrian and bicyclist falls). 0.062 –0.751 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact

Table 14. Design practice feasibility and impact scores (n = 44).

Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Improving sight distance at intersections by restricting parking at the corners (daylighting). 0.972 0.296 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing centerline rumble strips on undivided highways. 1.010 0.225 High Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing poles that break away when struck. 0.882 0.111 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing travel lane reconfigurations (road diets) at multi-lane roads with fewer than 20,000 AADT. 0.219 0.604 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing edge line rumble strips with bicycle gaps on undivided highways. 0.726 –0.442 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Setting default local road travel lane widths to 10 ft. 0.636 –0.397 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Installing right in/right out junctions that only allow vehicles to enter and exit from the right. 0.161 0.064 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing cable barriers in the medians of rural roads. 0.223 –0.206 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Installing cable barriers on the edges of rural roads. –0.114 –0.081 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Installing pedestrian hybrid beacons along arterials with 4+ travel lanes. –0.134 –0.142 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Converting conventional signalized intersections to single-lane roundabouts. –0.703 0.294 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing raised pedestrian/bicyclist crossings at driveways, minor street intersections, and midblock transit stop locations. –0.364 –0.073 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Installing permanent barrier protected bike lanes on arterial roads. –0.869 0.280 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Employing people with skills in perceptual psychology to help design “self-explaining” roads. –0.396 –0.322 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Creating “self-explaining” road designs where: local roads have narrow lanes and traffic calming; collector roads have bicycle lanes and safe pedestrian crossings; and arterial roads severely limit access and provide protected bicycle lanes and pedestrian crossings. –1.142 0.196 Very Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Providing pedestrian/bicycle bridges or daylit tunnels at intersections. –1.108 –0.407 Very Low Feasibility/Low Impact

Table 15. Operations and Maintenance practice feasibility and impact scores (n = 33).

Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Installing leading pedestrian intervals with right-turn-on-red restrictions in areas with high pedestrian activity. 0.750 0.545 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Removing roadside objects that pose a danger when impacted upon a lane departure. 0.291 0.597 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Including crash risk potential in prioritizations of resurfacing schedules (e.g., prioritizing surfaces with low skid resistance for resurfacing). 0.418 0.327 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Providing an exclusive signal phase for pedestrians in areas in high pedestrian volumes (e.g., pedestrian scramble or “Barnes Dance”). 0.067 0.286 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Developing joint action plans with emergency services partners to integrate operational planning with emergency services planning. 0.200 0.091 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Integrating asset management and crash analyses to determine when roadway conditions have degraded to the point that they are increasing the likelihood/severity of crashes. 0.062 0.155 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Improving signal progression on designated routes for emergency vehicles with pre-determined signal linking plans. 0.134 0.039 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Providing longer green times for cyclists at shared path crossings. 0.338 –0.236 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Employing an active or passive equipment maintenance and replacement system. 0.166 –0.127 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Developing a traffic guidance scheme (TGS) which details the use of specific traffic control devices (e.g., signs, barriers) during crash events. 0.444 –0.410 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Keeping a detailed inventory on the condition of the agencies’ transportation assets (e.g., bridges, tunnels, pavements, signs, signals, sidewalks, street furniture, vegetation). –0.040 –0.002 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Routinizing network-comprehensive (including bike and sidewalk networks) winter road clearance operations (e.g., snow and ice clearing, salt spreading where applicable). 0.025 –0.073 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Providing extended clearance intervals for passively detected pedestrians at signalized intersections. –0.046 –0.053 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing variable speed limits (VSL) on roads with high pedestrian activity at certain times and high potential for significant pedestrian-motor vehicle conflicts (e.g., school zones). –0.332 0.162 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Incorporating roadway features beyond pavement and safety infrastructure (e.g., drainage features, street furniture, vegetation) into asset management programs. –0.056 –0.162 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Combining passive pedestrian detection and accessible pedestrian signals (APS) to help pedestrians with low vision safely traverse intersections. –0.236 0.008 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Implementing VSL in the vicinity of traffic incidents. –0.579 0.169 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Extending clearance intervals for passively detected cyclists at signalized intersections. –0.145 –0.334 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing Driving Safety Support Systems (DSSSs) to avoid sign and signal violations and collisions. –0.546 –0.039 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing VSL during adverse weather conditions. –0.346 –0.372 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing VSL at nighttime in alcohol-serving districts. –0.569 –0.572 Low Feasibility/Low Impact

Table 16. Enforcement practice feasibility and impact scores (n = 61).

Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Instituting immediate administrative license revocation or suspension (ALR/ALS) for alcohol- and drug-impaired driving offenses. 0.225 0.424 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Instituting or enforcing a statewide primary enforcement seat belt use law, which would require occupants to wear seatbelts in the both the front and back seats and allow law enforcement officers to ticket occupants for not wearing a seatbelt, without other citable traffic infractions taking place. 0.204 0.426 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Instituting high-visibility saturation patrols for alcohol- or drug-impaired driving. 0.157 0.287 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Requiring alcohol ignition interlocks installed for all drivers convicted of DUI. 0.035 0.406 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Instituting or enforcing a statewide universal motorcycle helmet law, which would require all motorcyclists to wear US DOT compliant helmets, regardless of the rider’s age or experience. 0.116 0.177 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Placing serious crashes in a time- or place-based context when engaging news media partners. 0.134 –0.321 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing speed safety cameras (automated speed enforcement) that use revenues to fund safety infrastructure. –0.170 –0.061 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Implementing red-light camera enforcement that uses revenues to improve safety. –0.222 –0.169 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Linking police with EMS/hospital data for persons injured in motor vehicle crashes. –0.088 –0.344 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Forming a task force or community coalition of law enforcement, transportation, public health, members of the community, and other partners to investigate serious crashes and report findings and proposed changes to the public. –0.340 –0.127 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Encouraging and facilitating public use of self-reporting (via mobile app or survey) to capture collisions and other events falling outside the scope of traditional crash reporting (e.g., near misses, pedestrian and bicyclist falls). –0.051 –0.698 Low Feasibility/Low Impact

Table 17. Post-Crash Response practice feasibility and impact scores (n = 66).

Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Forming a task force or community coalition of law enforcement, transportation, public health, members of the community, and other partners to investigate serious crashes and report findings and proposed changes to the public. 0.418 0.300 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Training law enforcement and transportation staff to coordinate post-crash reporting at crash sites. 0.332 0.153 Moderate Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Developing joint action plans with emergency services partners to integrate operational planning with emergency services planning. 0.328 –0.145 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Linking police with EMS/hospital data for persons injured in motor vehicle crashes. –0.038 0.208 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Upgrading analog 911 infrastructure to Next Generation 911 (commonly referred to as NG911) to create a faster, more resilient system that facilitates public reporting to the 911 network. –0.073 0.242 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Placing serious crashes in a time- or place-based context when engaging news media partners. 0.473 –0.369 Moderate Feasibility/Low Impact
Establishing a traffic incident management (TIM) system that documents roadway and incident clearance times, as well as secondary crashes. –0.033 –0.085 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Practice Feasibility Impact Category
Instituting ACN for vehicle collisions with people walking, cycling, or rolling. –0.452 0.312 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Installing ACN systems on more remote, rural roadways. –0.335 0.137 Low Feasibility/Moderate Impact
Encouraging and facilitating public use of self-reporting (via mobile app or survey) to capture collisions and other events falling outside the scope of traditional crash reporting (e.g., near misses, pedestrian and bicyclist falls). –0.080 –0.566 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Deploying unmanned aerial systems (UAS) to conduct route monitoring, crash incident verification, secondary crash detection, and response vehicle routing to and from the crash site. –0.540 –0.187 Low Feasibility/Low Impact
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 22
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 23
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 24
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 25
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 26
Suggested Citation: "All Safety Practice Rankings (listed from most feasible and impactful to least)." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Applying the Safe System Approach to Transportation Planning, Design, and Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29148.
Page 27
Next Chapter: Focus Groups
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.