
Proceedings of a Symposium
NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
This activity was supported by an anonymous donation to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization, agency, or person that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-99323-4
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/29141
Additional copies of this publication are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242; https://nap.nationalacademies.org.
The manufacturer’s authorized representative in the European Union for product safety is Authorised Rep Compliance Ltd., Ground Floor, 71 Lower Baggot Street, Dublin D02 P593 Ireland; www.arccompliance.com.
Copyright 2025 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and National Academies Press and the graphical logos for each are all trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Issues at the Intersection of Engineering and Human Rights: Proceedings of a Symposium. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/29141.
The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. Tsu-Jae Liu is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task.
Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies.
Rapid Expert Consultations published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are authored by subject-matter experts on narrowly focused topics that can be supported by a body of evidence. The discussions contained in rapid expert consultations are considered those of the authors and do not contain policy recommendations. Rapid expert consultations are reviewed by the institution before release.
For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo.
CHARLES F. BOLDEN, JR. (NAE)1 (Co-Chair), The Charles F. Bolden Group, LLC
COLLEEN (BETSY) ELISABETH POPKEN (Co-Chair), University of California Berkeley School of Law
DAVIS CHACÓN-HURTADO, University of Connecticut
GLEN T. DAIGGER (NAE), University of Michigan and One Water Solutions, LLC
WESLEY L. HARRIS (NAE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology
DEB A. NIEMEIER (NAE), University of Maryland, College Park
DAVID A. BUTLER, J. Herbert Hollomon Scholar and Director, Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering Program, NAE
REBECCA EVERLY, Director, Committee on Human Rights of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), National Academy of Engineering (NAE), and National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
ANA DEROS, Associate Program Officer, Committee on Human Rights of the NAS, NAE, and NAM
CASEY GIBSON, Associate Program Officer, NAE
HOANG-NAM VU, Senior Program Assistant, NAS
CHESSIE BRIGGS, Program Coordinator, NAE
GURU MADHAVAN, Norman R. Augustine Senior Scholar and Senior Director of Programs, NAE
JOE ALPER, Science writer
___________________
1 NAE, National Academy of Engineering
This Proceedings of a Symposium was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in making each published proceedings as sound as possible and to ensure that it meets the institutional standards for quality, objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the process.
We thank the following individuals for their review of this proceedings:
JILL GAY, J Gay Associates, LLC
JONATHAN K. LAZAR, College of Information Studies, University of Maryland
TINA KEMPIN REUTER, Institute for Human Rights, University of Alabama at Birmingham
JOHN THARAKAN, Department of Chemical Engineering, Howard University
Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the proceedings nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this proceedings was overseen by ROBERT F. SPROULL, Oracle Labs (retired). He was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this proceedings was carried out in accordance with standards of the National Academies and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content rests entirely with the rapporteurs and the National Academies.
This Proceedings of a Symposium has been prepared by the rapporteurs as a factual summary of what occurred at the symposium. Statements, recommendations, and opinions expressed are those of individual presenters and participants and are not necessarily endorsed or verified by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and they should not be construed as reflecting any group consensus.
This page intentionally left blank.
ORGANIZATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS
2 Bridging Human Rights and Engineering
EXCHANGES BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTITIONERS AND ENGINEERS
HOW DO WE BRIDGE ENGINEERING AND HUMAN RIGHTS?
3 Human Rights and Engineering Education
FORCED DISPLACEMENT AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION
PRACTICAL INSIGHTS ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENGINEERING
4 Engineering to Promote Climate Justice
5 Addressing Inequalities in Public Infrastructure
ADDRESSING WATER INEQUITIES IN PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
BUILDING THE FOUNDATION OF GLOBAL HEALTH EQUITY
A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO ENGINEERING
6 A Human Rights-Based Approach to Engineering and Inclusive Transportation
REPORTS FROM THE BREAKOUT GROUPS
8 Participation and Inclusion in Engineering Decision Making
9 Seeking Justice and Remediating Human Rights Harms
THE ROLE OF HUMANS RIGHTS ASSESSMENTS IN IDENTIFYING AND REMEDIATING HUMAN RIGHTS HARMS
TECHNOLOGY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND HARM REDUCTION
AN EXPERIMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF ENGINEERING AND HUMAN RIGHTS
SCIENCE SUPPORTING SAFETY AS A HUMAN RIGHT
10 Integrating Human Rights Principles into Systems and Product Design
FINDING PLACE: INTERSECTIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENGINEERING
CISCO’S RESPONSIBLE AI JOURNEY
SOCIAL MEDIA ALGORITHMS AND HOMOPHILY
11 How to Conduct a Human Rights Assessment of Artificial Intelligence
A BRIEF REVIEW OF HUMAN RIGHTS
AN OVERVIEW OF HUMAN RIGHTS ASSESSMENTS
6-1 A Human Rights-Based Approach to Engineering and Inclusive Transportation Case Study Context
6-2 A Human Rights-Based Approach to Engineering and Inclusive Transportation Case Study Questions
11-1 “Long List of Human Rights”
2-1 A proposed framework for engineering for human rights
3-1 A framework for conflict-sensitive engineering design
5-1 Electric vehicle life-cycle stages and human rights concerns
8-1 Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
8-2 The MIT D-Lab design process
This page intentionally left blank.
| AAAS | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
| AI | artificial intelligence |
| CESER | Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering |
| CHR | Committee on Human Rights |
| CRPD | Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities |
| EPA | (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency |
| EU | European Union |
| LLM | large language model |
| MIT | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| NAE | National Academy of Engineering |
| NASEM | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (also abbreviated as “National Academies”) |
| SDWA | Safe Drinking Water Act |
| UN | United Nations |
| UNGP | UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
This page intentionally left blank.