
In total, staff from 22 airports responded to the online “Airport Survey on New Airline Onboarding.” The survey participants generally represented Air Service Development or Finance departments. A response to each question was not required and some participants may have skipped questions, resulting in varying response rates per question. The results of the survey are presented in this chapter.
As presented in Figure 1, nine airports were designated as small hub. Large hub, medium hub, and nonhub primary airports also participated in the survey effort.
The airlines most often onboarded at airports during the past 3 years are new entrants Breeze and Avelo. Twenty-one new airlines were onboarded (Figure 2).
When asked which airport staff member traditionally assumes the primary role for airline onboarding, participating airports most often indicated either the Director of Airline Affairs (4 survey responses) or the Airport Director (4 survey responses). Often, this is dependent on the size of the airport. Larger airports commonly require the Director of Airline Affairs or Air Service Development Manager to assume the lead role, while the Airport Director/Manager commonly assumes the primary role at smaller airports.
Other responses were the Director of Properties (2 survey responses), Assistant/Deputy Airport Director (2 survey responses), Director of Commercial Development (1 survey response), Director of Marketing (1 survey response), and Manager of Business Development (1 survey response.)
Given the dynamics of airline onboarding, multiple airport departments often play a role. The survey data show that some departments are more active in this role than others (Figure 3). Presented by airport hub size, Operations, Marketing, Finance, and Facilities/Maintenance are the most common additional airport departments involved with airline onboarding. The “Other” category typically referred to the Airport Director or Deputy Director.
Participating airports were asked about the highest priority areas/items that their airport must address when onboarding a new airline. Themes included the following:
Participating airports were asked how they address specific areas when onboarding a new airline. Although specific airport practices may not align with expected industry standards, themes, and comments in each area include the following:
According to one airport, “Gates are common use but need to be wired in for new airline. Gates are selected based on flight schedule and availability. A gate scheduling software is provided to the airline and all flights must be listed on the gate schedule. Signatory carriers can bump non-signatory carriers outside two weeks of the scheduled flight. This is overseen by the Deputy Airport Director.”
An airport explained, “The airline communicates who they will contract with, and our Commercial Use Permit (CUP) team will follow up and ensure the provider has a permit.”
As one airport shared, “The primary staff members responsible are the Common Use team and Airside Operations. If they are an International Carrier, then we ensure that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are involved.”
An airport explained, “We have bi-weekly meetings to discuss all aspects of onboarding with the airline and all of the internal/external stakeholders. The primary staff members responsible
are the Facilities team Sign Shop for any static signage and our Technology team for any digital signs such as our Dynamic Roadway signs.”
As one airport shared, “New airlines must be added to the FIDS system. This is a simple process of notifying the provider and supplying a jpg file of the airline logo and flight number for the first arriving flight. Check-in and gate equipment is proprietary to the airline including kiosks. Airport IT department will assist the airline IT department with establishing their own network and setting up their equipment.”
One airport noted, “Signatory airlines get preferential gates and non-signatories are on shared common use counters assigned 1-hour slots based on their flight schedule.” This is handled by Airport Operations.
An airport’s survey response noted, “The new airline is assigned an available common use ticket counter. This is often based on which company is ground handling the carrier. An attempt is usually made to arrange airlines along the ticket counter in a manner that keeps ground handlers together. This is not always achievable as some counters are exclusively leased by other airlines. This is handled by the Deputy Airport Director.”
As expressed in one survey response, “There are two common use bag claim devices that are shared by all the airlines. The use of a gate scheduling paradigm helps alleviate congestion by incentivizing carriers to decompress their flight schedule. While the gates are scheduled, bag claim devices are first-come. Operational issues are handled by airport operations.”
An airport survey response stated, “Low-cost carriers (i.e., non-signatory) will generally avoid leasing an ATO [Airline Ticket Office]. However, they are required to lease storage space for equipment they leave onsite. Should they request an ATO, either one will be assigned or additional space in the terminal will be developed into an ATO. The development department handles
planning and design, maintenance will construct the space, the Deputy Airport Director will negotiate the arrangement and oversee the process, finance will configure the operating agreement to account for the exclusive space, and the Airport Director will execute the agreement.”
One airport response stated, “The primary staff members responsible are the airlines as the Landing Fees are self-reported. For the City the Finance Divisions, Accounts Receivable processes the payment and then invoices for anything that was reported and remains outstanding or has not been paid and the Business and Properties, Airline Affairs team is responsible for ensuring the language is in the agreement and the tenant is aware of the fee/s.”
Participating airports were also asked about the type of lease agreements that new airlines are required to sign. As presented in Figure 4, an operating agreement is common at more than 80% of airports. A space lease is also common. Often the specific type of agreement is determined by airline needs and airport requirements. All airlines enter into some form of agreement prior to beginning service at an airport. “Other” responses typically reference some form of combined operating and space/gate lease agreements.
To further understand the dynamics associated with airline expectations, participating airports were asked, “What airline needs or expectations must your airport address?” Themes included the following:
As noted in one airport’s survey response, “Airline needs are generally operational in nature and tend to focus on IT-related infrastructure. This is particularly true for station startup. The airport will need to mediate the relationship between the airlines as it relates to sharing common use space/facilities. They will also need help making their announcement and establishing contacts with local contractors and service providers.”
Some airports are space-constrained, making accommodation of new airlines with sufficient space a challenge. As shared by one participating airport, “We are a rapidly growing airport, and our team is working diligently to address space constraints to allow continued growth by our airline partners.”
Given the dynamics of the airline industry (e.g., consolidation, mergers, and bankruptcies), participating airports were asked if any new entrant airlines within the past 5 years had ceased operations at their airport. Two-thirds of participating airports, or 15 survey responses, indicated that a new entrant airline had failed during this period. This supports both the importance of proper airline onboarding and the need for airports to remain flexible to evolving dynamics in the airline industry. Common-use space is one response by airports to account for these dynamics.
Finally, participating airports were asked if there were any lessons learned about airline onboarding that could be shared with other airports. Responses include the following:
that the CBP [Customs and Border Protection] seal process adds additional time to that process. While we have an amazing team at our airport and everyone is invested in making sure the airline has a successful start, it adds a layer of stress to all parties involved when these unexpected items come up and everyone is scrambling to find and implement a solution.”
The data reveal similarities and differences among airports. One finding is that Air Service Development staff are involved in airline onboarding even once the typical air service development functions are complete. The relationships these personnel have built with airline staff can continue to benefit the airport during the onboarding process. Next, some airports have common use, while others do not. Thus, specific space allocations, for example, will vary by airport. Third, IT is a significant aspect of airline onboarding. Given the robust digital platforms at many airports, this process can be the most time consuming of the onboarding process. Finally, aircraft servicing (both above- and below-wing) is commonly the discretion of the airline, although airport staff will support the airline decision-making process in this regard.
Information from the 22 airports can prove insightful for airports seeking their first airline service or for those airports with existing airline service. Learning from the experiences of other airports is a well-established method. Specific airport examples are presented via 12 case examples in Chapter 6.