The Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) is conducting research for the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) on integrating/consolidating ADA paratransit and on-demand microtransit services. This research, TCRP Synthesis SB-42: Operational and Service Factors When Integrating/Consolidating ADA Paratransit and On-Demand Services, will document the types of transit systemsʼ integrations/consolidations of ADA (or coordinated) paratransit service with microtransit service and the associated outcomes from customer and agency perspectives. The results from the research will provide an overview of:
1) Service designs and parameters of these trips in microtransit,
2) Technology and reservation features for customers,
3) Fleet mixtures and providers in service delivery,
4) Adherence to ADA compliance requirements,
5) Considerations for different types of disabilities, and
6) Benefits and impacts of the integration/consolidation.
This survey is the first step in the research project and needs to be completed by March 27, 2024. This survey will take approximately 20–25 minutes to complete. The survey saves your responses as you move from section to section. You can finish the survey later from the same IP address (using the same computer) within a two-week period.
This survey will ask questions about your agencyʼs ADA paratransit integration/consolidation with microtransit, including but not limited to the following:
The information you provide will be synthesized with information collected from other transit professionals. Your answers will be confidential to the extent permitted or required by law.
Your participation is greatly appreciated. If you have questions, concerns, or complaints regarding this study, you may contact [TTI]. You must be at least 18 to participate in the survey. You may be contacted by TTI to help clarify your answers or gather additional information.
The following questions ask about the agencyʼs integration/consolidation of ADA paratransit with on-demand microtransit service and confirmation of relevance.
For this survey, we are interested in any integrations/consolidations of ADA paratransit with microtransit services and its associated outcomes for transit agencies as well as ADA or coordinated paratransit customers. We are seeking to learn more about how transit agencies and their technology partners design these services with respect to the associated technologies, scheduling, and reservations parameters, grouping and routing of trips, stop locations by trip type, zone size parameters, performance goals and evaluation, and customer assistance policies or additional accommodations for ADA or coordinated paratransit customers using microtransit.
This research is concerned with ADA or coordinated trips that are commingled together with other general public trips in the same vehicles of the on-demand microtransit services. Microtransit is a technology-enabled demand-responsive transit service, typically using shuttles or vans with dynamic, real-time routing and scheduling. Microtransit pools passenger trips together, using pick-up and drop-off points at common destinations, generated in real-time for efficient routing or sometimes at the direct curb point the passenger is travelling to or from. By commingling, the two trip types may be served in the vehicle simultaneously rather than only being transported exclusively in separate vehicles. These integrations of service can include trips that are commingled in the same vehicle either using the same software or with different software systems for different trip types.
Here are some terms used throughout the survey questions about paratransit and commingling – take note now!
This research is not concerned with alternative services, interchangeable assets between services, or emergency-only commingling.
SUB-SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
Name: ___________________________________
Email: ___________________________________
Phone: ___________________________________
→ THANK AND TERMINATE
The column headers of the table are Service Operator, Directly Operated – Dedicated, Contracted – Dedicated, and Non-Dedicated. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: Paratransit: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 2: General Public Microtransit: Blank; Blank; Blank.
The column headers of the table are Software Platform, Directly Operated – Dedicated, Contracted – Dedicated, and Non-Dedicated. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: Paratransit: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 2: General Public Microtransit: Blank; Blank; Blank.
SUB-SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
The column headers of the table are Integrated or Consolidated Trip Type, Fare Rate, Stipulations, and Variations. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: General public microtransit: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 2: ADA Paratransit: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 3: Other Paratransit (coordinated or sponsored): Blank; Blank; Blank.
SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
The following questions ask about information involving the booking and scheduling processes along with communication procedures concerning different types of trips on integrated/consolidated services. These questions include discussion of technologies and staff resources used in these topical areas for both the transit agency and customer perspectives. This section also includes questions about fare payment options and scheduling change procedures for different types of trips.
The column headers of the table are Blank, Scheduling a trip, Scheduling standing order (subscription) trips, Modifying or cancelling a trip. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: Online: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 2: Call-in by phone: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 3: Smartphone app: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 4: Other [record open text response]: Blank; Blank; Blank.
SUB-SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
The following questions consider whether continuous dynamic optimization is applied towards ADA or coordinated paratransit trips in the integrated/consolidated service.
Continuous dynamic optimization (CDO), as applied to ADA paratransit services, is an automated process by which a scheduling and dispatching technology continuously or frequently considers additional trips just booked, changes to booked trips, cancellations, and day-of-service events to solve problems or to take advantage of opportunities. In view of those changes, the CDO process then re-optimizes the assignment of trips to achieve the transit agencyʼs desired balance of service/cost efficiency and service quality (definition from TCRP Synthesis 168).
SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
The following questions ask about further considerations in commingling for different customer types, any additional accommodations made for some ADA or coordinated paratransit customers on the integrated/consolidated service with microtransit, driver training for microtransit operators, and customer education available. This section also asks questions on ADA compliance considerations and how they are tracked for ADA paratransit trips commingled in microtransit.
SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
The following questions are focused on delivery of the integrated/consolidated on-demand service, in particular commingled trips. Topics explored will include the fleet mixture used for the service(s) and dispatching assignments to those vehicles based on the type of trip.
The column headers of the table are Number of Vehicles, Directly Operated – Dedicated, and Contracted – Dedicated. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: WAVs: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 2: Non-WAVs: Blank; Blank; Blank.
The column headers of the table are Number of Vehicles, Directly Operated – Dedicated, Contracted – Dedicated, and Non-Dedicated. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: WAVs: Blank; Blank; Blank. Row 2: Non-WAVs: Blank; Blank; Blank.
SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
The following questions asked measure impacts of the integrated/consolidated service from the perspectives of the transit agency and ADA or coordinated paratransit customers. This section will also pose questions on impacts to ADA compliance for complementary paratransit service from commingling.
The column headers of the table are Factor, 1 Made Significantly Worse (Decreased), 2 Made Somewhat Worse (Decreased), 3 No Impact, 4 Made Somewhat Better (Increased), 5 Made Significantly Better (Increased), N or A or not Measured. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: Number of Paratransit Trips and Requests: o; o; o; o; o; o.
The column headers of the table are Factor, 1 Made Significantly Worse (Decreased), 2 Made Somewhat Worse (Decreased), 3 No Impact, 4 Made Somewhat Better (Increased), 5 Made Significantly Better (Increased), N or A or not Measured. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: Cost Efficiency: o; o; o; o; o; o.
The column headers of the table are Period of Service, Productivity (Trips or VRH). The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: Weekdays: Blank. Row 2: Weekends: Blank.
SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
For the remaining questions in the survey, weʼd like to ask about the transit agencyʼs overall experience with the integration/consolidation of ADA or coordinated paratransit with general public microtransit service at your agency.
The column headers of the table are Potential Issue, 1 Not a problem at all, 2 Slight problem, and 3 Major challenges. The data given in the table row-wise are as follows: Row 1: Teaching paratransit customers unfamiliar with on-demand mobility how to ride the service: o; o; o. Row 2: Capabilities of the software platform(s) to meet service design needs: o; o; o. Row 3: Having enough dedicated vehicles to meet service demand: o; o; o. Row 4: Relying on non-dedicated vehicles to perform some of the dispatched microtransit trips: o; o; o. Row 5: Trust in the microtransit technology platform by transit agency staff: o; o; o.
SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -
Weʼd like to quickly ask a couple questions about other agency participants you believe should be included in this survey research.
Please advance so your information will be recorded.
SECTION DIVIDER HERE - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -