Previous Chapter: Introduction
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

REFERENCES

Al-Amin, K., Ewim, C., Igwe, A., & Ofodile, O. (2024). AI-driven end-to-end workflow optimization and automation system for SMEs. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i11.1688

Allam, Z., & Dhunny, Z. A. (2019). On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities, 89, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032

Azzahro, F., Hidayanto, A. N., & Shihab, M. R. (2025). Examining factors shaping citizens’ perception of artificial intelligence in government: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101518

Badger, J., Jirotka, M., Llorens, A., Goodloe, A., Hart, C., Eling, M., Pálsson, S., Dahbura, A., Falco, G., Pasquale, F., Gupta, J., Shneiderman, B., Yeong, Z., Winfield, A., Mackworth, A., Carrier, R., LaPointe, C., Johnson, H., Maple, C., & Danks, D. (2021). Governing AI safety through independent audits. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 566 - 571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00370-7

Barmer, H., Dzombak, R., Gaston, M., Palat, V., Redner, F., Smith, C., & Smith, T. (2021). Human-Centered AI. IEEE Pervasive Computing., 22, 7-8. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/16560183.V1

Bengio, Y., Hinton, G., Yao, A., Song, D., Abbeel, P., Darrell, T., Harari, Y. N., Zhang, Y. Q., Xue, L., Shalev-Shwartz, S., Hadfield, G., Clune, J., Maharaj, T., Hutter, F., Baydin, A. G., McIlraith, S., Gao, Q., Acharya, A., Krueger, D., … Mindermann, S. (2024). Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress. Science, 384(6698), 842–845. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn0117

Bibri, S., Ye, X., Yigitcanlar, T., Fookes, C., Li, W., & David, A. (2024). Unlocking artificial intelligence adoption in local governments: Best practice lessons from real-world implementations. Smart Cities. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040064

Bignami, F. (2022). Artificial intelligence accountability of public administration. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 70(Suppl 1), i312–i337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avac012

Bokhari, S., & Myeong, S. (2023). The influence of artificial intelligence on e-governance and cybersecurity in smart cities: A stakeholder’s perspective. IEEE Access, 11, 69783–69797. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3293480

Bose, I., Yan, C., Chan, F., & Zhang, X. (2022). Towards risk-aware artificial intelligence and machine learning systems: An overview. Decis. Support Syst., 159, 113800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113800

California Department of Transportation. (2024, March 5). Caltrans announces $1.1 billion for 80 new public transportation projects. https://dot.ca.gov/news-releases/news-release-2024-016

Campion, A., Gasco-Hernandez, M., Mikhaylov, S. J., & Esteve, M. (2020). Overcoming the challenges of collaboratively adopting artificial intelligence in the public sector. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320979953

Cantens, T. (2025). How will the state think with ChatGPT? The challenges of generative artificial intelligence for public administrations. AI & Society, 40(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01840-9

Center for Democracy & Technology. (2025, January 10). State government use of AI: The opportunities of executive action in 2025. https://cdt.org/insights/state-government-use-of-ai-the-opportunities-of-executive-action-in-2025/

Chen, H., Wang, P., & Hao, S. (2025). AI in the spotlight: The impact of artificial intelligence disclosure on user engagement in short-form videos. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, 108448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108448

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

Chen, T., Gascó-Hernandez, M., & Esteve, M. (2024). The adoption and implementation of artificial intelligence chatbots in public organizations: Evidence from U.S. state governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231200522

Chen, Y.-C., Ahn, M. J., & Wang, Y.-F. (2023). Artificial intelligence and public values: Value impacts and governance in the public sector. Sustainability, 15(6), 4796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064796

Cheong, B. C. (2024). Transparency and accountability in AI systems: Safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 6, 1421273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273

Choung, H., David, P., & Seberger, J. S. (2024). A multilevel framework for AI governance. In P. Shroff-Mehta, J. N. Sheth, J. Garrison, & S. R. Mehta (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Global and Digital Governance Crossroads (pp. 310–323). Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003316077-25

Chun, S. A., & Noveck, B. S. (2025). AI augmentation in government 4.0. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3716859

City of Boise. (2023). City use of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation (Regulation No. 4.30q). https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/human-resources/employee-policy-handbook/section-400-general-provisions/430q-city-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-regulation/

City of Long Beach. (2021). Survey depicts residents’ perceptions on smart cities and data privacy. https://longbeach.gov/smartcity/news/data-privacy-survey/

Coglianese, C. (2023). Procurement and artificial intelligence. In R. Paul, J. Cobbe, & E. Carmel (Eds.), Handbook on public policy and AI (University of Pennsylvania Public Law Research Paper No. 23-33). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4591724

Coglianese, C., & Shaikh, N. (2025). Management-based oversight of the automated state: Emerging standards for AI impact assessment and auditing in the public sector. In E. Yaghmaei et al. (Eds.), Global perspectives on AI impact assessment. Oxford University Press.

Congressional Research Service. (2025). Regulating artificial intelligence: U.S. and international approaches (CRS Report No. R48555). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R48555

County of Sonoma. (2024, September 10). Administrative Policy 9-6: Information Technology Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy (Consent 024-0802). Information Systems Department, County of Sonoma Board of Supervisors. https://sonoma-county.legistar.com/

Cubric, M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technology in Society, 62, 101257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257s

D’Amico, G., L’Abbate, P., Liao, W., Yigitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. (2020). Understanding sensor cities: Insights from technology giant company driven smart urbanism practices. Sensors, 20(16), 4391. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164391

David, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Desouza, K., Li, R. Y. M., Cheong, P. H., & Mehmood, R. (2024). Understanding local government responsible AI strategy: An international municipal policy document analysis. Cities, 155, 105502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105502

Dedema, M., & Hagen, L. (2025). AI-driven public consultation platforms: Transforming civic engagement in local governments. In Conference on Digital Government Research (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.59490/dgo.2025.953

De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., Joshi, A., & Huygh, T. (2020). COBIT as a framework for enterprise governance of IT. In S. De Haes & W. Van Grembergen (Eds.), Enterprise governance of information technology (3rd ed., pp. 125–162). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25918-1_5

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

Delaware General Assembly. (2024). House Bill 333, 152nd General Assembly (84 Del. Laws, c. 307). An act to amend Title 29 of the Delaware Code relating to the Artificial Intelligence Commission. https://legis.delaware.gov/BillDetail?LegislationId=141960

Eichholz, L. (2025). Municipal AI integration: A structured approach. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-025-00056-3

Engstrom, D. F., Ho, D. E., Sharkey, C. M., & Cuéllar, M.-F. (2020). Government by algorithm: Artificial intelligence in federal administrative agencies (NYU School of Law Public Law Research Paper No. 20-54). New York University School of Law. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551505

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.

Falco, G., Shneiderman, B., Badger, J., Carrier, R., Dahbura, A., Danks, D., Eling, M., Goodloe, A., Gupta, J., Hart, C., Jirotka, M., Johnson, H., LaPointe, C., Llorens, A., Mackworth, A., Maple, C., Pálsson, S., Pasquale, F., Winfield, A., & Yeong, Z. (2021). Governing AI safety through independent audits. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00370-7

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Leutge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Fonner, D., & Coyle, F. (2024). Responsible AI for government program evaluation and performance audits. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), 8222–8224. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData62323.2024.10825518

Garousi, V., Petersen, K., & Ozkan, B. (2016). Challenges and best practices in industry-academia collaborations in software engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 79, 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFSOF.2016.07.006

Gloudemans, R., & Sanderson, P. (2021). The potential of artificial intelligence in property assessment. Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.63642/1357-1419.1241

Government of the District of Columbia. (2024, February 8). Articulating DC’s artificial intelligence values and establishing artificial intelligence strategic benchmarks (Mayor’s Order No. 2024-028). Office of the Mayor. https://mayor.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/mayormb/release_content/attachments/Mayor%27sOrder2024-028ArticulatingDCsArtificialIntelligenceValues.pdf

Guha, N., Lawrence, C. M., Gailmard, L. A., Rodolfa, K. T., Surani, F., Bommasani, R., Raji, I. D., Cuéllar, M.-F., Honigsberg, C., Liang, P., & Ho, D. E. (2024). AI regulation has its own alignment problem: The technical and institutional feasibility of disclosure, registration, licensing, and auditing. The George Washington Law Review, 92(5), 1473–1557. https://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/92-Geo.-Wash.-L.-Rev.-1473.pdf

Hanna, M., Pantanowitz, L., Jackson, B., Palmer, O., Visweswaran, S., Pantanowitz, J., Deebajah, M., & Rashidi, H. (2024). Ethical and bias considerations in artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning. Modern Pathology, 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686

Heinisuo, E., Kuoppakangas, P., & Stenvall, J. (2025). Navigating AI Implementation in Local Government: Addressing Dilemmas by Fostering Mutuality and Meaningfulness. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10599-x

Helsby, J., Carton, S., Joseph, K., Mahmud, A., Park, Y., Navarrete, A., Ackermann, K., Walsh, J., Haynes, L., Cody, C., Patterson, M. E., & Ghani, R. (2017). Early intervention systems: Predicting adverse interactions between police and the public. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(2), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403417695380.

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

Hickok, M. (2024). Public procurement of artificial intelligence systems: new risks and future proofing. AI & society, 39(3), 1213-1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01572-2

Jacob, C., Brasier, N., Laurenzi, E., Heuss, S., Mougiakakou, S., Çöltekin, A., & Peter, M. (2024). AI for IMPACTS framework for evaluating the long-term real-world impacts of AI-powered clinician tools: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27. https://doi.org/10.2196/67485

Jaillant, L., & Rees, A. (2022). Applying AI to digital archives: Trust, collaboration and shared professional ethics. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38, 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac073

Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021). Ready or not, AI comes—An interview study of organizational AI readiness. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7

Jung, J. (2023). Concerns and alternatives to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by local governments. Journal Civic Politics, 6, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.54968/civicpol.2023.6.51

Kawakami, A., Coston, A., Zhu, H., Heidari, H., & Holstein, K. (2024, May). The situate AI guidebook: Co-designing a toolkit to support multi-stakeholder, early-stage deliberations around public sector AI proposals. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–22). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642849

Kelly, S., Kaye, S. A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2021). Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing – Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies. Technovation, 110, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375.

Königstorfer, F., & Thalmann, S. (2022). AI Documentation: A path to accountability. Journal of Responsible Technology, 11, 100043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100043

Kumar, A., Rizvi, S. A., Brooks, B., Vanderveld, R. A., Wilson, K. H., Kenney, C., Edelstein, S., Finch, A., Maxwell, A., Zuckerbraun, J., & Ghani, R. (2018). Using machine learning to assess the risk of and prevent water main breaks. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219835

Landers, R., & Behrend, T. (2022). Auditing the AI auditors: A framework for evaluating fairness and bias in high stakes AI predictive models. American Psychologist, 78(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000972

Lauterbach, A., & Bonime-Blanc, A. (2018). The artificial intelligence imperative: A practical roadmap for business. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Lawrence, C., Cui, I., & Ho, D. E. (2023). The bureaucratic challenge to AI governance: An empirical assessment of implementation at U.S. federal agencies. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ′23) (pp. 1047–1057). https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604701

Leoni, G., Bergamaschi, F., & Maione, G. (2021). Artificial intelligence and local governments: The case of strategic performance management systems and accountability. In A. Visvizi & M. Bodziany (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and its contexts: Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications (pp. 137–148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88972-2_10

Li, Y., & Goel, S. (2024). Making It Possible for the Auditing of AI: A Systematic Review of AI Audits and AI Auditability. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10508-8

Liu, Z., Tu, S., & Xu, M. (2024). Assessing AI adoption effectiveness in digital enterprises: An organizational AI adoption maturity framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4952238

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

Lottu, O. A., Jacks, B. S., Ajala, O. A., & Okafo, E. S. (2024). Towards a conceptual framework for ethical AI development in IT systems. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0735

Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2022). AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 40, 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101774

Malali, N., & Madugula, S. (2025). Robustness and Adversarial Resilience of Actuarial AI/ML Models in the Face of Evolving Threats. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1287

Martins, M. R. (2023). Adapting change management strategies for the AI Era: Lessons from large-scale IT integrations. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(3), 1604–1629. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.3.1556

Matthew, B., Garba, P., Ajirotutu, R., & Olu, J. (2024). Advancing lean construction through Artificial Intelligence: Enhancing efficiency and sustainability in project management. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.2.0623

McNeese, N. J., Demir, M., Cooke, N. J., & Myers, C. (2018). Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming. Human Factors, 60(2), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817743223

Merhi, M. I. (2023). An evaluation of the critical success factors impacting artificial intelligence implementation. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102545

Miller, G. J. (2022). Stakeholder roles in artificial intelligence projects. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100068

Murikah, R. W., Zain, J. M., & Zolait, A. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence in local governments: A review of accountability and ethics in AI applications. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752024000100001

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Artificial intelligence opportunities for state and local DOTs: A research roadmap. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27865

National Association of Counties. (2024). AI county compass: A comprehensive toolkit for local governance and implementation of artificial intelligence. https://www.naco.org/resource/ai-county-compass-comprehensive-toolkit-local-governance-and-implementation-artificial

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2024). Artificial intelligence in government: The federal and state landscape. https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-in-government-the-federal-and-state-landscape

National Governors Association. (2025). Legal and Regulatory Considerations for States Related to Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved: https://www.nga.org/updates/legal-and-regulatory-considerations-for-states-related-to-artificial-intelligence/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). AI risk management framework (version 1.0). https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework

National League of Cities. (2023). The ethics and governance of generative AI: Comparing municipal policies in Boston MA, San Jose CA, Seattle WA and Tempe AZ. https://www.nlc.org/article/2023/10/10/the-ethics-and-governance-of-generative-ai/

___. (2024). Artificial intelligence demystified – AI toolkit for municipalities. https://www.nlc.org/resource/ai-report-and-toolkit/

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

National Science Foundation. (2023). National Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes Program. https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/national-artificial-intelligence-research-institutes

Nemitz, P. (2018). Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180089. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089

New York City Office of Technology and Innovation. (2023). New York City artificial intelligence action plan. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/oti/downloads/pdf/reports/artificial-intelligence-action-plan.pdf

Nihi, T. V., Forkuo, A. Y., Ojo, O. O., Nwokedi, C. N., & Soyege, O. S. (2025). Advances in decision-support frameworks for emergency response and public health resource allocation. International Journal of Health and Pharmaceutical Research, 10(3), 17–53. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijhpr.vol.10.no3.2025.pg17.53

Office of the Governor of New Jersey (2023, October 10). Executive Order No. 346. https://d31hzlhk6di2h5.cloudfront.net/20231010/e7/5b/7d/96/a898d65e01b6941bfd77839f/EO-346.pdf

Office of Governor of Pennsylvania. (2023, September 20). Executive Order 2023-19. https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/oa/documents/policies/eo/2023-19.pdf

Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022). Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making automated systems work for the American people. The White House. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449

Pan, I., Nolan, L. B., Brown, R. R., Khan, R., van der Boor, P., Harris, D. G., & Ghani, R. (2017). Machine learning for social services: A study of prenatal case management in Illinois. American Journal of Public Health, 107(6), 938–944. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.303711

Prasetyo, M., Peranginangin, R., Martinovic, N., Ichsan, M., & Wicaksono, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in open innovation project management: A systematic literature review on technologies, applications, and integration requirements. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(1), 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100445

Reim, W., Åström, J., & Eriksson, O. (2020). Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI): A roadmap for business model innovation. AI, 1(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020011

Richardson, R., Schultz, J. M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Dirty Data, Bad Predictions: How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and Justice. New York University Law Review Online. https://nyulawreview.org/online-features/dirty-data-bad-predictions

Salomon, E., Bauman, M. J., Lin, T., Boxer, K., Naveed, H., Haynes, L., Walsh, J., Helsby, J., Yoder, S., Sullivan, R., Schneweis, C., & Ghani, R. (2017). Reducing incarceration through prioritized interventions. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209811.3209869

Schelble, B. G., Lopez, J., Textor, C., Zhang, R., McNeese, N. J., Pak, R., & Freeman, G. (2024). Towards Ethical AI: Empirically Investigating Dimensions of AI Ethics, Trust Repair, and Performance in Human-AI Teaming. Human Factors, 66(4), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221116952

Schiff, D., Borenstein, J., Biddle, J., & Laas, K. (2021). AI ethics in the public, private, and NGO sectors: A review of a global document collection. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 2(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2021.3052127

Schiff, D. S., Schiff, K. J., & Pierson, P. (2022). Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence. Public Administration, 100(3), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12742

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 59–68). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598

Selten, F., & Klievink, B. (2024). Organizing public sector AI adoption: Navigating between separation and integration. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101885

Sheridan, T. B. (2008). Risk, human error, and system resilience: Fundamental ideas. Human Factors, 50(3), 418–426. https://doi.org/10/b2tnqp

Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 10(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764

Sloane, M. (2022). Threading innovation, regulation, and the mitigation of AI harm: Examining ethics in national AI strategies. In M. Tinnirello (Ed.), The global politics of artificial intelligence (pp. 1–28). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Sloane, M., & Wüllhorst, E. (2025). A systematic review of regulatory strategies and transparency mandates in AI regulation in Europe, the United States, and Canada. Data & Policy, 7, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.54

Soe, R.-M., & Drechsler, W. (2018). Agile local governments: Experimentation before implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.010

State of Alaska. (2024). SB 177: An act relating to artificial intelligence; requiring disclosure of deepfakes in campaign communications; relating to cybersecurity; and relating to data privacy. https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Bill/Detail/33?Root=SB%20177

State of California. (2023). Executive Order N-12-23. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/AI-EO-No.12-_-GGN-Signed.pdf

State of Maryland. (2024). Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet. https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/08conoff/cabinet/html/ai.html

State of Oregon. (2023, November 28). Executive Order No. 23-26: Establishing the Oregon State Government Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council. https://www.oregon.gov/gov/eo/eo-23-26.pdf

State of Pennsylvania. (2023). Expanding and governing the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/oa/documents/policies/eo/2023-19.pdf

State of Texas. (2023a). Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council. https://aiadvisorycouncil.texas.gov/s/

___. (2023b). House Bill 2060: Relating to the creation of the Artificial Intelligence Advisory Council. Texas Legislature Online. https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/pdf/HB02060F.pdf

State of Vermont. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Task Force final report. https://legislature.vermont.gov/assets/Legislative-Reports/Artificial-Intelligence-Task-Force-Final-Report-1.15.2020.pdf

Stilgoe, J. (2024). AI has a democracy problem. Citizens’ assemblies can help. Science, 385(6711), eadr6713. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr6713

Stone, M., Aravopoulou, E., Ekinci, Y., Evans, G., Hobbs, M., Labib, A., Laughlin, P., Machtynger, J., & Machtynger, L. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) in strategic marketing decision-making: A research agenda. The Bottom Line, 33(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2020-0022

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of artificial intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008

Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910

Ulnicane, I., Knight, W., Leach, T., Stahl, B., & Wanjiku, W. (2020). Framing governance for a contested emerging technology: insights from AI policy. Policy and Society, 40, 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800

Uren, V., & Edwards, J. S. (2023). Technology readiness and the organizational journey towards AI adoption: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102588

Utah State Legislature. (2024). S.B. 149: Artificial Intelligence Amendments (2024 Gen. Sess.). https://le.utah.gov/~2024/bills/static/SB0149.html

Vermont General Assembly. (2022). An act relating to expanding access to expungement and sealing of criminal history records (Act 132). https://legislature.vermont.gov/Documents/2022/Docs/ACTS/ACT132/ACT132%20As%20Enacted.pdf

Wang, Y.-F., Chen, Y.-C., Chien, S.-Y., & Wang, P.-J. (2024). Citizens’ trust in AI-enabled government systems. Information Polity, 29(3), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-230065

Weerts, S. (2025). Generative AI in public administration in light of the regulatory awakening in the US and EU. Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance, 1, e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2024.10

Whittaker, M., Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Fried, G., Kaziunas, E., Mathur, V., Myers West, S., Richardson, R., Schultz, J., & Schwartz, O. (2018). AI now report 2018. AI Now Institute at New York University. https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.pdf

Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., & Cave, S. (2019). The role and limits of principles in AI ethics: Towards a focus on tensions. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ′19) (pp. 195–200). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314289

Wilson, C. (2022). Public engagement and AI: A values analysis of national strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101652

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103

World Economic Forum. (2023). Adopting AI responsibly: Guidelines for procurement of AI solutions by the private sector. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Adopting_AI_Responsibly_Guidelines_for_Procurement_of_AI_Solutions_by_the_Private_Sector_2023.pdf

Wright, L., Muenster, R. M., Vecchione, B., Qu, T., Cai, P., Smith, A., Comm 2450 Student Investigators, Metcalf, J., & Matias, J. N. (2024, June). Null Compliance: NYC Local Law 144 and the challenges of algorithm accountability. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1701–1713). https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658998

Yigitcanlar, T., Agdas, D., & Degirmenci, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in local governments: Perceptions of city managers on prospects, constraints and choices. AI & Society, 38(3), 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01450-x

Yigitcanlar, T., Corchado, J., Mehmood, R., Li, R., Mossberger, K., & Desouza, K. (2021). Responsible urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.

agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC7010071

Yigitcanlar, T., Li, R. Y. M., Inkinen, T., & Paz, A. (2022). Public perceptions on application areas and adoption challenges of AI in urban services. Emerging Sciences Journal, 6(6), 1199–1236. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-06-01

Yigitcanlar, T., David, A., Li, W., Fookes, C., Bibri, S., & Ye, X. (2024a). Unlocking artificial intelligence adoption in local governments: Best practice lessons from real-world implementations. Smart Cities, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040064

Yigitcanlar, T., Senadheera, S., Marasinghe, R., Bibri, S. E., Sanchez, T. W., Cugurullo, F., & Sieber, R. (2024b). Artificial intelligence and the local government: A five-decade scientometric analysis on the evolution, state-of-the-art, and emerging trends. Cities, 152, Article 105151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105151

Young, M., Katell, M., & Krafft, P. M. (2019). Municipal surveillance regulation and algorithmic accountability. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719868492

Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577

Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 28
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 29
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 30
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 31
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 32
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 33
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 34
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 35
Suggested Citation: "REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Strategies for Integrating AI into State and Local Government Decision Making: Rapid Expert Consultation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/29152.
Page 36
Next Chapter: AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES
Subscribe to Email from the National Academies
Keep up with all of the activities, publications, and events by subscribing to free updates by email.