

CHAIR: Carol A. Lewis, Professor, Transportation Studies, Texas Southern University, Houston
VICE CHAIR: Leslie S. Richards, General Manager, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), Philadelphia
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Victoria Sheehan, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
Michael F. Ableson, CEO, Arrival Automotive–North America, Detroit, MI
James F. Albaugh, President and CEO, The Boeing Company (retired), Scottsdale, AZ
Carlos M. Braceras, Executive Director, Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City
Douglas C. Ceva, Vice President, Customer Lead Solutions, Prologis, Inc., Jupiter, FL
Nancy Daubenberger, Commissioner of Transportation, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul
Marie Therese Dominguez, Commissioner, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany
Garrett Eucalitto, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Transportation, Newington
Chris T. Hendrickson, Hamerschlag University Professor of Engineering Emeritus, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Randell Iwasaki, President and CEO, Iwasaki Consulting Services, Walnut Creek, CA
Ashby Johnson, Executive Director, Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO), Austin, TX
Joel M. Jundt, Secretary of Transportation, South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre
Hani S. Mahmassani, W.A. Patterson Distinguished Chair in Transportation; Director, Transportation Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Scott C. Marler, Director, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames
Ricardo Martinez, Adjunct Professor of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, GA
Michael R. McClellan, Vice President, Strategic Planning, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk, VA
Russell McMurry, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta
Craig E. Philip, Research Professor and Director, VECTOR, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
Steward T.A. Pickett, Distinguished Senior Scientist, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY
Susan A. Shaheen, Professor and Co-director, Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
Marc Williams, Executive Director, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin
Michael R. Berube, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Sustainable Transportation, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC
Shailen Bhatt, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
Amit Bose, Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC
Tristan Brown, Deputy Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
Steven Cliff, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento
Rand Ghayad, Senior Vice President, Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC
LeRoy Gishi, Chief, Division of Transportation, Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, Germantown, MD
William H. Graham, Jr. (Major General, U.S. Army), Deputy Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC
Robert C. Hampshire, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
Sue Lawless, Acting Deputy Administrator, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Washington, DC
Niloo Parvashtiani, Engineer, Mobility Consultant Solutions, Iteris Inc., Fairfax, VA, and Chair, TRB Young Members Coordinating Council
Sophie Shulman, Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC
Karl Simon, Director, Transportation and Climate Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Paul P. Skoutelas, President and CEO, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC
Polly Trottenberg, Deputy Secretary of Transportation and Acting Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
Jim Tymon, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
Veronica Vanterpool, Acting Administrator, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC
___________________
* Membership as of May 2024.
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM
NCHRP RESEARCH REPORT 1109
John M. Holt
Maria D. Lopez
Thomas P. Murphy
MODJESKI AND MASTERS, INC.
Mechanicsburg, PA
Joshua S. Steelman
Scott K. Rosenbaugh
Andrew E. Loken
Ronald K. Faller
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN
Lincoln, NE
Marcus Galvan
FORESIGHT PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC
Austin, TX
Mark Bloschock
VRX, INC.
Plano, TX
Subscriber Categories
Highways • Bridges and Other Structures • Safety and Human Factors
Research sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration

Systematic, well-designed, and implementable research is the most effective way to solve many problems facing state departments of transportation (DOTs) administrators and engineers. Often, highway problems are of local or regional interest and can best be studied by state DOTs individually or in cooperation with their state universities and others. However, the accelerating growth of highway transportation results in increasingly complex problems of wide interest to highway authorities. These problems are best studied through a coordinated program of cooperative research.
Recognizing this need, the leadership of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in 1962 initiated an objective national highway research program using modern scientific techniques—the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). NCHRP is supported on a continuing basis by funds from participating member states of AASHTO and receives the full cooperation and support of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), United States Department of Transportation, under Agreement No. 693JJ31950003.
The Transportation Research Board (TRB) of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine was requested by AASHTO to administer the research program because of TRB’s recognized objectivity and understanding of modern research practices. TRB is uniquely suited for this purpose for many reasons: TRB maintains an extensive committee structure from which authorities on any highway transportation subject may be drawn; TRB possesses avenues of communications and cooperation with federal, state, and local governmental agencies, universities, and industry; TRB’s relationship to the National Academies is an insurance of objectivity; and TRB maintains a full-time staff of specialists in highway transportation matters to bring the findings of research directly to those in a position to use them.
The program is developed on the basis of research needs identified by chief administrators and other staff of the highway and transportation departments, by committees of AASHTO, and by the FHWA. Topics of the highest merit are selected by the AASHTO Special Committee on Research and Innovation (R&I), and each year R&I’s recommendations are proposed to the AASHTO Board of Directors and the National Academies. Research projects to address these topics are defined by NCHRP, and qualified research agencies are selected from submitted proposals. Administration and surveillance of research contracts are the responsibilities of the National Academies and TRB.
The needs for highway research are many, and NCHRP can make significant contributions to solving highway transportation problems of mutual concern to many responsible groups. The program, however, is intended to complement, rather than to substitute for or duplicate, other highway research programs.
Project 22-41
ISSN 2572-3766 (Print)
ISSN 2572-3774 (Online)
ISBN 978-0-309-70994-1
Library of Congress Control Number 2024939957
© 2024 by the National Academy of Sciences. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the graphical logo are trademarks of the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein.
Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, APTA, FAA, FHWA, FTA, GHSA, or NHTSA endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of the material, request permission from CRP.
The research report was reviewed by the technical panel and accepted for publication according to procedures established and overseen by the Transportation Research Board and approved by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the researchers who performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board; the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; the FHWA; or the program sponsors.
The Transportation Research Board does not develop, issue, or publish standards or specifications. The Transportation Research Board manages applied research projects which provide the scientific foundation that may be used by Transportation Research Board sponsors, industry associations, or other organizations as the basis for revised practices, procedures, or specifications.
The Transportation Research Board; the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; and the sponsors of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names or logos appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of the report.
Published research reports of the
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM
are available from
National Academies Press
500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360
Washington, DC 20001
(800) 624-6242
and can be ordered through the Internet by going to
https://nap.nationalacademies.org
Printed in the United States of America

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president.
The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.
The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.
Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org.
The Transportation Research Board is one of seven major program divisions of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The mission of the Transportation Research Board is to mobilize expertise, experience, and knowledge to anticipate and solve complex transportation-related challenges. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 8,500 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation.
Learn more about the Transportation Research Board at www.TRB.org.
Waseem Dekelbab, Deputy Director, Cooperative Research Programs, and Manager, National Cooperative Highway Research Program
Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Senior Program Officer
Sheila A. Moore, Program Associate
Natalie Barnes, Director of Publications
Heather DiAngelis, Associate Director of Publications
Alexander K. Bardow, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, MA (Chair)
Arielle Ehrlich, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Oakdale, MN
Paul Fossier, Jr., Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, LA
Monique Hite Head, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Timothy J. Keller, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, OH
Taya Retterer, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX
Eduardo Arispe, FHWA Liaison
This research report was prepared under NCHRP Project 22-41 by a research team led by Modjeski and Masters, Inc., with John Holt as the Principal Investigator, supported by Dr. Thomas Murphy, Akshay Randiwe, Avinash Shaw, and Dr. Maria Lopez. The team consisted of Dr. Joshua Steelman, Andrew Loken, Scott Rosenbaugh, and Dr. Ronald Faller of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln/Midwest Roadside Safety Facility; Mark Bloschock of VRX, Inc.; and Marcus Galvan of Foresight Planning and Engineering Services, LLC.

By Ahmad Abu-Hawash
Staff Officer
Transportation Research Board
NCHRP Research Report 1109: Bridge Railing Design Requirements presents an update to bridge railing design requirements to ensure consistency with the state of knowledge. The update incorporates the guidelines from NCHRP Research Report 1024: Evaluation of Bridge Rail Systems to Confirm AASHTO MASH [Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware] Compliance and NCHRP Research Report 1078: MASH Railing Load Requirements for Bridge Deck Overhang. The research findings will be used by state departments of transportation structural engineers responsible for designing and evaluating bridge railing systems.
The language of “Section 13: Railing” in the AASHTO LRFD [Load and Resistance Factor Design] Bridge Design Specifications, published in 2007, has not had a major revision since LRFD specifications were adopted. Some of the text date back to the 1989 AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings. Then, in 2009, MASH replaced the 1993 NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. Finally, on January 7, 2016, AASHTO and FHWA signed a joint implementation agreement requiring all new permanent installation and full replacement of bridge rails on the national highway system in contracts let after December 31, 2019, to be compliant with MASH.
Therefore, there was an immediate need to update the bridge railing design requirements to incorporate MASH requirements and address outdated language and areas of ambiguity particularly related to loads, load distribution to bridge barriers and deck overhangs, railing geometry, and analysis methods for determining the demand and capacity of bridge barriers.
Under NCHRP Project 22-41, “Proposed Modification to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Section 13—Railing,” Modjeski and Masters, Inc. was asked to (1) propose updates to bridge railing design requirements and (2) develop examples to demonstrate the application of the proposed updates. The research team suggested draft language for consideration by AASHTO in the next update of the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and provided analysis and design examples to illustrate the proposed updates.
An appendix containing the analysis and design examples is available by searching for NCHRP Research Report 1109: Bridge Railing Design Requirements on the National Academies Press website (nap.nationalacademies.org).
This page intentionally left blank.

Evolution of AASHTO Bridge Rail Specifications
Comparison of NCHRP Report 350 to MASH 2016 Criteria
Impact Force Estimation Methods
AASHTO LRFD BDS Design Parameters
Design and Analysis of Bridge Rail Systems
Design and Analysis of Bridge Deck Overhangs
Barrier Geometry Considerations
Chapter 3 Synthesis of Literature Review
Accounting for Deck Flexibility
Dynamic and Static Increase Factors
Static Equivalent Design Loads
Static Equivalent Design Loads
Concrete Bridge Rail Design Methods
Transmission of Impact Loads to Deck Structure
Effect of Deck Flexibility on Barrier Capacity
Required Deck Overhang Strength