Completed
Topics
The National Climate Assessment, coordinated by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, is a mandated report intended to inform response decisions. Required to be developed every four years, these reports provide the most comprehensive and up-to-date evaluation of climate change impacts available for the United States, making them a unique and important climate change document. This report evaluates the draft NCA4 to determine if it meets the requirements of the federal mandate, whether it provides accurate information grounded in the scientific literature, and whether it effectively communicates climate science impacts, and responses for general audiences.
Featured publication
Consensus
ยท2018
Climate change poses many challenges that affect society and the natural world. With these challenges, however, come opportunities to respond. By taking steps to adapt to and mitigate climate change, the risks to society and the impacts of continued climate change can be lessened. The National Clima...
View details
Description
An ad hoc committee will conduct a review of the draft 4th National Climate Assessment concurrent with the public comment period. The review will address the following questions about the draft report:
- Does the report meet the requirements of Section 106 of the Global Change Research Act?
- Do the key messages reflect current understanding about observed and projected impacts to the United States, the challenges, opportunities and success stories for addressing risk, and identification of emerging issues related to climate change?
- Does the report accurately reflect the peer-reviewed scientific literature, with a particular focus on literature since the last National Climate Assessment (i.e., since ~2013)? Are there any critical content areas missing from the report?
- Are the findings documented in a consistent, transparent and credible way?
- Is the report written at a technical level that is appropriate for the intended audience?
- Are the report's key messages and graphics clear, internally consistent, and appropriate? Specifically, do they reflect supporting evidence, include an assessment of likelihood, and communicate effectively?
- Are the data and analyses handled in a consistent, transparent, and credible manner? Are statistical methods applied appropriately?
- What other significant improvements, if any, might be made in the document?
Contributors
Committee
Chair
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Sponsors
NASA
Staff
April Melvin
Lead
Major units and sub-units
Center for Health, People, and Places
Lead
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Lead
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Lead
Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate
Lead
Board on Environmental Change and Society
Lead
Earth Systems and Resources Program Area
Lead